However, in the 20th and 21st centuries, historians have reexamined the evidence with greater scrutiny, distinguishing propaganda from fact. Some scholars argue that Richard III was a capable and conscientious ruler, deeply concerned with justice and the welfare of his subjects.
Legal Reforms and Justice
One of the most remarkable aspects of Richard III’s short reign (1483–1485) was his progressive approach to law and governance. He issued the Titulus Regius to legitimize his claim to the throne, but beyond political maneuvering, he introduced reforms aimed at protecting the poor and weak from exploitation by powerful nobles.
Richard established the Court of Requests, which allowed poor people to seek justice without the burden of high legal costs. He also passed laws against illegal land seizures and ensured that local officials upheld the law fairly. Chroniclers such as Dominic Mancini noted his attention to detail in governance and his desire to rule justly.
Protector of the Commons?
Richard’s policies suggest a king who, despite the political violence of the time, sought to protect the common people from the excesses of the aristocracy. His reforms targeted corruption and abuse of power, which were rampant during the Wars of the Roses. Some historians argue that this focus on justice for ordinary people was a genuine attempt to stabilize the kingdom.
Military and Political Challenges
Richard’s reign was tumultuous, caught amid factional rivalries and the ongoing civil strife of the Wars of the Roses. He became king after the suspicious disappearance of his nephews, and his legitimacy was contested. His enemies, including Henry Tudor, used propaganda to portray him negatively.
Despite these pressures, Richard displayed military skill and leadership, notably in quelling uprisings and defending his kingdom’s interests. shutdown123
Comments on “Reexamining Richard III: A King of Reform?”